[Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mack.Joseph at epamail.epa.gov Mack.Joseph at epamail.epa.govTue Jun 7 08:33:06 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Trouble with MPICH-1.2.6 and PGI 6.0
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joseph Mack PhD, High Performance Computing & Scientific Visualisation LMIT, Supporting the EPA Research Triangle Park, NC 919-541-0007 Federal Infrastructure Contact-Ravi Nair 919-541-5467 - nair.ravi at epa.gov, Federal Visualization Contact - Joe Retzer, Ph.D. 919-541-4190 - retzer.joseph at epa.gov I've just found out about Clos networks and realised that myrinet uses Clos networks. From reading http://www.beowulf.org/archive/2002-June/007458.html I see that the diameter of the Clos network is log(n). >From other reading I find that 3 layer Clos networks are blocking but that 5 (and above) layers are non-blocking. The url above shows that Myrinet uses a 3 layer Clos network for 24..128 nodes, but presumably the network is blocking. In an mpi type beowulf running a scatter/gather, if one node is blocked, then all nodes have to wait. Is this OK or am I missing something? With large beowulfs, why is the diameter of the network increased from 3 to 5 to 7...? It would be cheaper to keep the networking at 3 layers. What falls apart that you need to increase the diameter of the network? Sorry if this is all a FAQ. I've been reading for about 2 weeks now and don't understand Clos networking yet. Thanks Joe
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Trouble with MPICH-1.2.6 and PGI 6.0
- Next message: [Beowulf] Clos networking and myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
