[Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mikhail Kuzminsky kus at free.netThu Jul 14 05:46:48 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [gorelsky@stanford.edu: CCL:dual-core Opteron275performance]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In message from "S.I.Gorelsky" <gorelsky at stanford.edu> (Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:21:32 -0700 (PDT)): > > >>The original post by S.Gorelsky (re-sent by E.Leitl) was about good >>scalability of 4cores/dual-CPUs Opteron 275 server on Gaussian 03 >>DFT/test397 test. I'm testing just now like Supermicro server >>w/2*Opteron 275 but w/DDR333 instead of DDR400 used by S.Gorelsky. >>I used SuSE 9.0 w/2.4.21 kernel. > >>I understood, that original results of S.Gorelsky were obtained, >>probably, for shared memory parallelization! > >This is correct. I did not use Linda parallelization. The reason >for that is Linda's "far-from-best" scalability with Gaussian 03. It depends. DFT, for example, (and not only DFT) has good scalability under Linda also (about 1.8-1.9 at every twice increasing of CPU numbers). And I don't remember, what else than HF and DFT is parallelized in G03 for shared memory ? Yours Mikhail
- Previous message: [Beowulf] [gorelsky@stanford.edu: CCL:dual-core Opteron275performance]
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Opteron 275 performance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
