[Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comMon Feb 14 13:57:03 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Joachim, Joachim Worringen wrote: > Patrick Geoffray wrote: > >> Seriously, here are MPI latencies with MX on F cards on Opteron >> (PCI-X), that includes fibers and a switch in the middle: >> >> Length Latency(us) Bandwidth(MB/s) >> 0 2.684 0.000 > > [...] > > Nice work, Patrick - but such numbers are of little value if the > benchmark used to get them is not stated. I'd recommend mpptest (from > MPICH). Plus, the compiler etc. is also of interest when it comes to > latencies. Thanks. Such numbers have always little value coming from a vendor. My point was simply that >10us was not really today's ballpark. For your curiosity, it was using an in-house MPI Pingpong (one message at a time, not a bogus pipelined pingpong used to confuse people and make big pipes look good). For very small messages, most of Pingpong codes are similar, compiler has no impact (it was using the gcc that was installed on the machine at that time). For asymptotic bandwidth, the major difference is the way you compute 1 MB, either 1024*1024 Bytes, or 1000000 Bytes. In the networking world, it tends to be 1000000 Bytes. Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Next message: [Beowulf] Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
