[Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Isaac Dooley idooley at isaacdooley.comFri Feb 11 12:39:29 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies (Greg Lindahl)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>True. I always wonder what the low-CPU-usage-advocates want the MPI >process to do while i.e. an MPI_Send() is executed. > They don't want the process to do anything when the call MPI_Send, however carefully using asynchronous or non-blocking messaging ideally would not use the CPU. Using MPI_ISend() allows programs to not waste CPU cycles waiting on the completion of a message transaction. This is critical for some tightly coupled fine grained applications. Also it allows for overlapping computation and communication, which is beneficial. Isaac Dooley
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies (Greg Lindahl)
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Re: Home beowulf - NIC latencies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
