[Beowulf] Re: real hard drive failures
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Glen Gardner Glen.Gardner at verizon.netTue Feb 1 17:20:00 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: real hard drive failures
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: real hard drive failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
USB flash is really slow. Regular CF (@ 128 KB/s writes) on a cf to ide adapter is a lot faster (particularly write speed) than USB flash (@ 64 KB/s write speed) "thumb drives". I've had good luck with IBM microdrives, but CF is getting cheaper than microdrives. Of course , the microdrives are a lot faster (@ 1MB/s R/W) than CF on write. But CF is pretty fast on read (10 MB/s ??). CF has a limited number of writes before it fails , anywhere from 100K to 1M write cycles. The time for write cycles is typically anywhere from 300 milliseconds to 500 milliseconds for a 32 KB chunk for regular CF. Typically you write a chunk of CF at once in each write cycle, and 32KB is a typical figure for that (but it varies with the particular memory chips used). This is why CF is so awfully slow when writing. Using serial CF makes it even worse, which is one reason why USB thumb drives are even slower than regular CF cards. CF is okay for booting a system from, but things like /tmp , /var are best mountd in a memory file system and only written to cf when shutting down. Swap partitions and /home need to be mounted via NFS. At present, I have two nodes of a 14 node cluster booting from CF, and /home is mounted on another machine with a proper hard drive via NFS. Ten of the nodes are booting from microdrives, and two nodes have ata 133 hard drives for /home, development and backups. /var /tmp and swap are actually mounted on the cf card, and I'm waiting to see how long before the cf actually expires. These nodes have been up 24/7 for over a month now, with no problems. I have not tried to force the nodes to swap. For saving power and reducing heat, CF is going to be the best you can get. Microdrives are almost as good, laptop drives are pretty good, and a regular IDE drive is a pig in comparison. I use a USB thumb drive with a bootable OS on it as an emergency boot drive. It comes in handy when installing a node. Since I use microdrives, all I do is shut down the node and plug the new microdrive into the cf adapter, and the cf thumb drive in the usb port and turn the node on, and it boots from USB so I can then install a system image stored on the development node onto the new microdrive via an NFS mount. It takes about 5 minutes to install and configure a new node in this fashion. Writing the disk image to a 512 MB cf card is going to take up to an hour, and plan on at least twice that to write a disk image to a 512 MB USB flash. (CF is just plain slow) Glen Mark Hahn wrote: >>>on that note, though - does anyone have comments about booting >>>machines from flash? >>> >>> >>> >>I've booted a mini-ITX system from flash, >>the distribution in question was a wireless access point. >>All you need is a CF to IDE adapter. >> >> > >I don't really see those much at all. perhaps I'm not using >the right search terms. > >have you looked into booting from usb-flash? that would be very >much dependent on bios, of course, but far more accessible. > >thanks, mark hahn. > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > > -- Glen E. Gardner, Jr. AA8C AMSAT MEMBER 10593 Glen.Gardner at verizon.net http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze24qhw/index.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: real hard drive failures
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: real hard drive failures
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
