[Beowulf] experiences with MRJ-21 'telco' connectors and patch panels
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bruce Allen ballen at gravity.phys.uwm.eduWed Dec 28 10:37:19 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] p4_error
- Next message: [Beowulf] experiences with MRJ-21 'telco' connectors and patch panels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For our upcoming NEMO cluster, I would like to buy a Foundry Networks switch (RX-16) with 48-port copper GigE cards that use 'mini RJ-21' (telco) connectors rather than the more standard RJ-45 ones. These MRJ-21 connectors carry the equivalent of six standard CAT5E ethernet lines. So a 48-port card has eight MRJ-21 connectors plugged into it. The 48-port cards are not available with RJ-45 connectors because the RJ-45 connectors are physically too large: one can't get 48 of them onto the front of the card. Since the remainder of our cluster (hosts, edge switches, etc) will use standard RJ-45 connectors, we need to use 'patch panels' to convert the MRJ-21 to RJ-45. Does anyone on the list have good or bad experiences with such patch panels and with MRJ-21? Cheers, Bruce
- Previous message: [Beowulf] p4_error
- Next message: [Beowulf] experiences with MRJ-21 'telco' connectors and patch panels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
