Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Compare and contrast MPI implementations

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.com
Tue Dec 13 23:00:43 PST 2005


On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 01:16:21PM -0800, David Mathog wrote:

> What advantages and disadvantages do each of these have?

I see no one else wants to volunteer to answer this one... my
impression has been that the reason some folks suggest using LAM is
mainly because LAM has a better tcp driver than MPICH-1 has. Other
than that there isn't much difference. Just looking at an strace of
what MPICH-1 does gives me the willies. But I don't think that means
anything is wrong with the overall design, it's just some
implementation details gone wrong in that one device. I've never
looked at MPICH-2's tcp driver, perhaps it's better.

> Are the MPI 2 standards fully backwards compatible with code written
> to the MPI 1.2 standard?

Yep.

-- greg



More information about the Beowulf mailing list