[Beowulf] opteron 248 vs dual-core opteron 275
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSun Dec 4 12:07:19 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Applications in Submarine Environment
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cluster Applications in Submarine Environment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Marc: Marc Noguera wrote: [...] > My doubts arise about the performance of 4 single-threades applications, > on a one per-core basis. Will this performance be better on a > 2proc./4cores node or on two 2proc/2node configuration. I am talking > about totally independent processes. I believe that the two 2proc/2node > configuration will perform better, doen any body know if it is like this > and if it is which relationship exists for these performances?. This is entirely program dependent. If you run programs that consume large bandwidth to memory, you may have issues. If your programs are less memory bandwidth sensitive, then you might have some good results. We did a study of this a while ago. You can download it from this URL: http://enterprise2.amd.com/downloadables/Dual_Core_Performance.pdf > On the other hand, it seems clear to me that heat dissipation of the > dual-core configuration will be much better. Can anyone confirm that. For a dual core and single core running at the same frequency clock, yes, the dual core is better in terms of dissipating less heat per core. > Does the dual-core cpu dissipate approx. the same heat as a single-core > one? > Are there many problems on the use of dual-core application by linux OS, > or is it really a no-problemo thing as I have read? We have not run into serious issues. Mostly we have run into problems with certain North American Dominant Linux vendors distributions (cough cough) being rather poor in their support for the NUMA nature of the system, or using ancient kernels missing many features, or using kernels lacking basic drivers for modern chipsets (leading to kernel panics immediately after booting). > BTW, we use our cluster mostly for computational chemistry calculations, > mainly gaussian, turbomole, molcas and such. Depending upon how you run Gaussian, it could be more sensitive to IO conditions than other issues. It will consume memory bandwidth for a number of calculations. We have a customer who purchased a (small/tiny and not worth talking about according to some here on the list) cluster with 144 cores in dual core units, whom have run Gaussian continuously on this system from the day after it was up. No issues that we are aware of, and they have used about 10-CPU years of cycles running these codes in the last 7 weeks. They are running lots of chemistry applications with no issues on the cluster. > Thanks for your answers No problem, glad to help if we can. Joe > Marc > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Marc Noguera Julian > Tecnic suport a la Recerca > Despatx c7-149 > Quimica Física - Universitat Autonoma Barcelona > 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès. > Barcelona, Catalunya. > Tef: 34 93 5812173 > Fax: 34 93 5822920 > -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Cluster Applications in Submarine Environment
- Next message: [Beowulf] Cluster Applications in Submarine Environment
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
