[Beowulf] SGE Queue Priorities
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSun Dec 4 11:49:19 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGE Queue Priorities
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: portable clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Have a look at priority ticket handling under gridengine on the http://gridengine.sunsource.net site. You can always use subordinated queues and play tricks with that without messing with priorities. You might also have a look at creating functional policies to help out. Joe Jenno Claesson wrote: > Hello, > > We are implementing as our Resource Manager the Sun Grid Engine v6 ( > N1GE6) (Not Enterprise Edition), and as part of that I am trying to > understand how to establish the priority of a job submitted in one > queue, over a job submitted earlier in a different queue. > > I have setup the following configurations on my laptop using VMWare with > RedHat and the Grid Engine. > > If I have two queues configured, with the only difference being the > priority, and the queue name. The modified values from the defaults are > below. > Parameter Queue 1 Queue 2 > qname Queue1 Queue2 > hostlist RedHatLocal RedHatLocal > priority 20 -20 > slots 1 1 > > Other modifications > - For the single execution host (RedHatLocal), the only modification to > the execution host is to give it a slots value of 1 to make it easy to > track which jobs are being sent through to it from the queues > (complex_values slots=1). > - I have also modified the scheduler configuration (qconf -msconf) > setting reprioritize_interval to 0:0:3. > > What I am expecting is that if I have a number of pending jobs for > Queue1, if I then submit a job explicitly to Queue2, that the job > submitted to Queue2 should be the next job to run. However this is not > the behaviour that I see. What I am seeing is the jobs being executed > in their sequential (FIFO) order. > > Does anyone have any thoughts? > > _________________________________________________________________ > Start something musical - 15 free ninemsn Music downloads! > http://ninemsn.com.au/share/redir/adTrack.asp?mode=click&clientID=667&referral=HotmailTaglineNov&URL=http://www.ninemsn.com.au/startsomething > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SGE Queue Priorities
- Next message: [Beowulf] RE: portable clusters
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
