Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Upgrading to gigabit

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Jeffrey B. Layton laytonjb at charter.net
Fri Apr 22 14:15:59 PDT 2005


Timo,

   Can you be more specific? For example, N-body simulations.
Also, how many nodes are you planning to use?

Jeff

> Hi Jeff,
>
> We are planning on running some simulations for physics on these for 
> now, but the rest is still somewhat open ended.  Would a task such as 
> this warrant the use of gigabit?  Given the price it might almost be 
> worth it either way.  Thanks again.
>
> -Timo
>
>
> At 10:19 AM 4/22/2005, Jeffrey B. Layton wrote:
>
>> Timo Mechler wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I will be setting up a small cluster using some older servers very 
>>> soon.  They are IBM Netfinity 4000R's with 2x PIII 750mhz, 1024mb 
>>> ram, 2 x 9.1 SCSI hdd, and 2 x 10/100mbit onboard LAN.  Would we see 
>>> a performance increase by upgrading these to gigabit?  Or would it 
>>> be a waste of time and resources?  Thanks in advance for your help.
>>
>>
>>
>> Hah! I'm going to beat rgb to the gun even though I'll be writing
>> considerably less :)
>>
>> What application(s) do you currently run on the cluster? This
>> is the proverbial $64 question. If the applications are bottlenecked
>> by networking then you could see a huge leap in performance.
>> If the apps are bottlenecked by CPU performance, then you
>> will not likely see a big boost in performance (although NFS
>> performance would improve greatly using GigE).
>>   How many servers do you have? The 32-bit, PCI, Intel GigE
>> NICs are pretty good and inexpensive (less than $30). Plus you
>> could use something like an SMC 8505T (5-port) or 8508T
>> (8-port) GigE switch that will give you jumbo frames, for a
>> pretty low cost (the 8508T is about $100).
>>   There are other options as well. Since you have 2 FastE
>> ports, you could play with an FNN (aggregate.org/FNN/). Or
>> you could try channel bonding them.
>>   GigE is cheap enough that you could use channel bond GigE
>> and use something like MP_Lite
>> (www.scl.ameslab.gov/Projects/MP_Lite/) with your MPI codes
>> to take advantage of the bonded interface (caution: not all
>> MPI's can use channel-bonded GigE, but MP_Lite claims
>> that they can. However, MP_Lite is a subset of MPI, but it
>> captures the primary functions that most MPI applications use).
>>
>> Enjoy! (and don't be afraid to ask lots of questions here).
>>
>> Jeff
>
>
>




More information about the Beowulf mailing list