[Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caWed Apr 6 08:02:27 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> 64-node RH-9 based Beowulf cluster. I had a difficult time trying to > upgrade our cluster from RH-8.0 to FC-2 because the Adaptec Ultra160 > drivers in FC-2 were broken, so I went to RH-9 instead. this actually gets back to one of the points that got lost: it's quite trivial to substitute a kernel that works into some random distribution. yes, there are sometimes dependencies (eg FC uses initrd, udev and some other fairly newfangled kernel features). but applications mostly don't know or care about the kernel: they're more likley interested in glibc. the problem here is that apps are saying "qualified on RH 3.14159", rather than "needs glibc 2.2+". it's all about apps comforming to standards, avoiding undefined behavior such as the kernel stack size. AND specifying their requirements up front, rather than saying something annoying and misleading like may fail in unpredictable ways on anything except RH 3.14159 vendors usually euphemize that as "supported config: RH 3.14159".
- Previous message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
