[Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caFri Apr 1 14:00:10 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] new opteron question
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Opterons will do better with a 2.6 kernel (2.6.9 and higher). If you > are going to use RHEL, you might want to look at Rocks (RHEL3 based) or > Warewulf which should be able to sit atop RHEL4. If you want to use a > Redhat work-alike, you might want to look closely at Centos4. why the heck does anyone care about distributions any more!?! distributions are all just repackagings of the same stuff, sometimes with extra magic in the form of slightly tuned desktop GUI decorations. > I am sure others will take issue with this, but I would strongly > advise against using a rolling beta OS (FC-x) as the basis for a > production cycle machine. If it is a purely experimental cluster, go calling a non-test FC release "beta" is just plain petty; all software is beta by that definition. regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] new opteron question
- Next message: [Beowulf] OS for 64 bit AMD
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
