[Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Seth Bardash seth at integratedsolutions.orgThu Oct 21 10:37:50 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----Original Message----- From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of Alan Scheinine Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 2:49 AM To: Beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations Many venders sell U1 cases for dual Opteron based on the Tyan main boards, but on the other hand, a vender here says that the product Newisys 2100 is much more reliable than Tyan though it costs 10 to 20 percent more. I have not previously heard of Newisys and I do not recall it being mentioned in this mailing list. Would anyone like to comment? best regards, Alan Scheinine Email: scheinin at crs4.it _______________________________________________ Alan and the list, First, let me say that I am not trying to suggest to anyone to buy our products, only provide information we have seen integrating Dual Opteron systems: 1) The Newisys boards are made expecially for them and only come in their cases. I can not comment on their reliability as we have not used nor tried to integrate their systems. I think Sun uses them and charges appropriately for Sun. 2) We have built over 250 Dual Opteron systems, mostly 1U's used in large linux clusters. Initially, we used Tyan MB's and found that we were getting around a 10% to 15% DOA rate here before burn-in. After burn-in we had no failures here or deployed. So.... My take on the Tyan Dual Opteron MB's is that they work fine once they have gone through burn-in but the DOA rate out of the box is not good. YMMV. We then switched to the Arima (www.accelertech.com) HDAMA, ATO-2161 motherboards. These have had DOA's only caused by the UPS gorillas - All 2 of the HDAMA MB's that were DOA were received in badly damaged boxes. Over 190 have now been received and integrated with no failures - either here, in burn-in or in the field. BTW, this motherboard is the AMD reference design and has been very robust even with Enhanced Latency memory (CL 2-3-2-6-1). We have installed Fedora Core 2, RH ES 3.0, White Box Linux and SUSE 9.1 and they all work fine. We are testing the Server and Workstation Iwill motherboards (www.iwillusa.com) and they seem to work fine so far. There are many other factors that should influence Dual Opteron vendor selection. These factors are: cooling, performance, configuration, I/O, reliability, technical expertise, support and price - your order of importance will usually dictate a vendor. Hope this provides the feedback required to make an informed decision about motherboard selection and system vendors. Seth Bardash Integrated Solutions and Systems http://www.integratedsolutions.org Supplier of AMD and Intel Servers and Systems running Windows and Linux. *Failure can not cope with perseverance* --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.779 / Virus Database: 526 - Release Date: 10/19/2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Next message: [Beowulf] dual Opteron recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
