[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comThu Nov 18 20:31:33 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 08:50:08AM +0800, xiang wrote: > > >>Greg, >> >>Could you tell me the web address of low-latency fat examples ? > > > There are two major ones: Quadrics, which has a low latency nic and > switch, and my company's newly announced InfiniPath, which has a low > latency nic and uses standard Infiniband switches, which are a bit > higher latency than Quadrics' switches. Which latency number qualify for the "low-latency fat" club ? Patrick -- Patrick Geoffray Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list