[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comFri Nov 19 11:02:05 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPICH-1.2.5 hangs on 16 node cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:31:33PM -0500, Patrick Geoffray wrote: > Which latency number qualify for the "low-latency fat" club ? Patrick, I didn't really want to go there when I was first asked, and now I'm going to stop digging. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPICH-1.2.5 hangs on 16 node cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Register article on Opteron - disagree
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list