[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ashley Pittman ashley at quadrics.comTue Nov 16 03:08:59 PST 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 08:50 +0800, xiang wrote: > Greg, > > Could you tell me the web address of low-latency fat examples ? A shameless plug but I believe we are the lowest latency fat tree network. I have seen as little as 1.38 MPI latency although it's very dependant on node-type. http://www.quadrics.com/ Here is the top500 page for one of the big systems: http://www.top500.org/sublist/System.php?id=6762 Ashley,
- Previous message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Next message: [Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list