[Beowulf] torus versus (fat) tree topologies

[xiang]

Greg, 

Could you tell me the web address of low-latency fat examples ? 

3x in advance. 

gnib 

 --- Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pathscale.com> µÄÕýÎÄ£º
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:45:12PM -0500, Chris Sideroff wrote:
> 
> >   I have had the luxury of testing an SCI 2D torus cluster and found 
> > latency performance to be exceptional.
> 
> Right. So is that a feature of the NIC, or a feature of the torus
> instead of a fat tree/CLOS/CBB network? Answer: the NIC.
> 
> There are several examples of low-latency fat tree/CLOS/CBB networks.
> 
> -- greg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf
>  

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
150ÍòÇúMP3·è¿ñËÑ£¬´øÄú´³ÈëÒôÀÖµîÌÃ
http://music.yisou.com/
ÃÀÅ®Ã÷ÐÇÓ¦Óо¡ÓУ¬ËѱéÃÀͼ¡¢ÑÞͼºÍ¿áͼ
http://image.yisou.com
1G¾ÍÊÇ1000Õ×£¬ÑÅ»¢µçÓÊ×ÔÖúÀ©ÈÝ£¡
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_1g/