[Beowulf] Correct Units for quoting Interconnect Bandwidth ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Dan Kidger daniel.kidger at quadrics.comFri May 28 05:36:37 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Next message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I have spotted an anomaly when comparing b_eff results with PMB: http://www.hlrs.de/organization/par/services/models/mpi/b_eff/ http://www.pallas.com/e/products/pmb/ The former uses 1.e6 when displaying 'MBytes/s', where that latter appears to use 2^20. (aka 'Mebibytes/s') viz from PMB's Output.c: static double MEGA = 1.0/1048576.0; if( tmax > 0. ) throughput = (Bmark->scale_bw*SCALE*MEGA)*size/tmax; SCALE=1000000 (declare.h) size is in bytes, tmax in usec, and scale_bw=2 if say doing PingPong The result is that PMB figures appear *lower* than equivalent b_eff figures. Do we have a concensus of what units we should be using? So does a 1GB/s interconnect transfer 1 Gigabyte in a second or 1,000,000,000 bytes in a second? (As interconnects move from Kilo though Mega to Giga the gap is of course widening) -- Yours, Daniel. -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Dan Kidger, Quadrics Ltd. daniel.kidger at quadrics.com One Bridewell St., Bristol, BS1 2AA, UK 0117 915 5505 ----------------------- www.quadrics.com --------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Next message: [Beowulf] harmonic mitigators vs PFC?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
