[Beowulf] Which do you prefer local disk installed OS or NFS rooted?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Brent M. Clements bclem at rice.eduWed Jul 14 13:38:39 PDT 2004
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IPMI / SOL howto document
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which do you prefer local disk installed OS or NFS rooted?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Good Afternoon All: Let me start by giving a little background. Currently all of our clusters on campus have local disks which by using the systemimager suite of tools has an os image installed There are one or two clusters that are nfsrooted. I'd like to know from all of you, which way is everyone leaning when it comes to clusters and os distribution. Do you a. Install your OS on each local disk?(using whatever method, kickstart,systemimager, etc) or b. do you nfsroot and then use the local disk space as scratch and swap. What benefits and drawbacks have all of you seen by doing either? The Research/linux support group(which I am team lead of) here is leaning towards moving all of our clusters to model b. We've done both and from a sysadmin perspective we've found doing most things by nfs root a heck of alot easier than maintaining a systemimager configuration. Thanks in advance! -Brent Brent Clements Linux Technology Specialist Information Technology Rice University Linux at Rice news and information available only at http://linuxsupport.rice.edu
- Previous message: [Beowulf] IPMI / SOL howto document
- Next message: [Beowulf] Which do you prefer local disk installed OS or NFS rooted?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
