Beowulf [& VMWare]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Timothy H. Keitt tkeitt at mail.utexas.eduThu Oct 31 14:53:56 PST 2002
- Previous message: Beowulf & VMWare
- Next message: Block Sizes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 13:30, Donald Becker wrote: > > As most list readers know, I consider Mosix to be an academically > interesting system and its transparent process migration an excellent > touchstone to compare process migration approachs. > > Mosix is not a good system for scalable or performance-oriented > clustering, and I agree with your conclustion that Mosix+VMware > application serving is not a good match. VMware aside, I'm not aware that openmosix precludes the use of mpi or pvm or standard batch processing. Are these not good solutions for scalable or performance-oriented clustering? Tim > -- > Donald Becker becker at scyld.com > Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com > 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Scyld Beowulf cluster system > Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Timothy H. Keitt The University of Texas at Austin Section of Integrative Biology 1 University Station C0930 Austin, Texas 78712-0253 USA
- Previous message: Beowulf & VMWare
- Next message: Block Sizes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list