Two heads are better than one! :)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joseph Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comThu Oct 31 18:26:55 PST 2002
- Previous message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Next message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 20:56, Bob Drzyzgula wrote: > Thus, the question becomes whether any of the various > cluster APIs and services such as PVM, MPI, BPROC, PBS, > etc. are dependant on the selection of a single, exclusive > master. Clearly if multiple simultaneously operating > masters are tolerated in the API, you can just have > multiple head nodes which are available all the time. If > an API requires a single master, one might have to effect > some sort of manual switch-over in the event of a head > node failure; this would then raise the question of the > complexity of such a switch-over, e.g. would compute node > reconfiguration be required or would it simply be a matter > of starting up the controller service on a new system. Hi Bob: It is more complex than that, in that you would need to preserve state changes over the length of the program, and PVM/MPI/et al do not preserve this state information. The folks at LANL had a fault tolerant MPI at one point, but I haven't heard much of it recently. Joe -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Scalable Informatics LLC email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web: http://scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Next message: Two heads are better than one! :)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
