Dual CPU nodes?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Robert G. Brown rgb at phy.duke.eduTue Oct 22 08:52:12 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Dual CPU nodes?
- Next message: Dual CPU nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Ken Chase wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:28:09AM -0400, Robert G. Brown's all... > > > Most standard circuits have enough capacity to run two duals or four > > singles - you can estimate that they'll draw somewhere in the vicinity > > of 400-600 Watts, which is roughly a third the capacity of a twenty amp > > circuit for a switching power supply load, more like half the capacity > > of a 15 amp circuit. Then you've got a monitor and network switch, > > which can be another 100-200 Watts. A beefy UPS is not a bad thing to > > wow. thats huge. I had 8 dual 2466s with 1.3tbirds on a 15Amp circuit (no > disk). When I moved it to a new building, I am guessing that the voltage was a > bit different, and the power bars they were wired into started blowing. > (perhaps they were drawing more amps at a lower voltage than my install > area?) At any rate, I put them in 8 per 20 amp circuit (instead of my > original intall 8/15) and nothing has blown (oh, and only 4 per power bar > too now :). Are you spec'ing for some seriously heavy disk power loads? My recent experiences with 2466's and building wiring are in the recent list archives and they are a sorry mess, although they are in the process of running the additional neutral wires required to get us perhaps semistable. We are finding that we can run at most 8 per 20 amp circuit here as well. One reason for the constriction in number of systems relative to their average power draw is that the switching power supplies draw a much higher PEAK current to provide the average power than one expects -- they have a relatively poor power factor. Apparently the circuit breakers used are sensitive to peak current more than rms current. Perhaps your 15 amp circuit used slow-blow breakers that were more sensitive to rms current than peak? The danger of doing this is that one can dangerously overload primary transformers and cause them to prematurely burn out. There are URL's in the stuff I posted last week (and some of the extended discussion that has occurred on this subject) that explain all of this. I now just assume that any system I plug in has a power factor no better than about 0.8 (and will thus draw a peak current that is 25% or better high) and, because of the harmonic distortion of the supply voltage sinusoid, prefer to keep circuits relatively underloaded. We've seen a LOT of power related problems on circuits loaded close to capacity, although the non-shared neutrals may help this (I hope). > [A friend told me about blowing a circuit once at his lab and he had a large > metal bracelet on. When the circuit blew, he was standing under the power > run (about 5 feet over his head in the ceiling) and his bracelet shot up his > arm and yanked on his wrist, quite hard! He had a bruise to prove it. It > was only a 20A circuit - what would cause that? Dangerous wiring situation?] I have no idea. The current in the overhead line should have been balanced -- hot and neutral currents opposing in the conduit, the conduit itself grounded to boot to shield whatever field the resulting inductive surge would have caused. I don't see how an inductive EMP could have been generated strong enough to create a current in a bracelet that would magnetically attract it to the dropping line current. Unless, perhaps, the overhead power run contained a single, unshielded high current line that was grounded at the panel, or there was a transformer nearby, and the pulse from this was responsible. Even then I'd be surprised that such a strong impulse force was generated -- 20 amps isn't all that strong a current, so somewhere a much larger current must have been induced. But I'm not a wiring expert. Maybe this is normal. > > For that reason you might well want to select systems based on their low > > power requirements rather than their speed... > > Has anyone here actually done this based on a full TCO analysis where > operations cost were as large (or larger) a factor than initial install? > Are TMTA's worth it in this situ? Sorry, TCO I get, but TMTA's? rgb Robert G. Brown http://www.phy.duke.edu/~rgb/ Duke University Dept. of Physics, Box 90305 Durham, N.C. 27708-0305 Phone: 1-919-660-2567 Fax: 919-660-2525 email:rgb at phy.duke.edu
- Previous message: Dual CPU nodes?
- Next message: Dual CPU nodes?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
