Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

C++ programming

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Kevin Cole kjcole at gri.gallaudet.edu
Mon Oct 21 12:08:38 PDT 2002


Without knowing either lanugage, I look at the C++ version and say
"Huh?" Whereas when looking at the Java version, I at least can make
some guess as to what it does.  The example provided is exactly what
keeps me away from C++ and the like: Instead of learning a few commands
and manipulating them, one memorizes the bible, the dictionary, and the
thesaurus (or searches through some tome -- electronic or hardcopy).  
IDE's or whatever may help search the tome, but still...

Granted, the wheels that people reinvent may not be the ideal wheel, and
there'll be a lot of variations in design.  I can see where that would
be a disadvantage if you do a lot of shipping your code around to the
four corners of the universe.

> "Consider the now-trite "word count" program that uses a map data structure
> to keep track of the number of instances of each word in a document.  In
> Java, a language not known for its economy of expression, you'll need code
> something like the following to process a word:
> 
> if ( !myMap.containsKey( key ) )
> 	myMap.put( key, new Integer( 1 ) );
> else {
> 	Integer count = (Integer) myMap.get( key );
> 	int icount = count.intValue( );
> 	myMap.put( key, new Integer( ++icount ) );
> }
> 
> whereas in C++ it is simply:
> 
> myMap[key]++;
> 
> More expressive power begets higher-level programming, which in turn leads
> to elegant, readable code."
> 
> I would love to see the FORTRAN version of this code....

	CALL something_I_write_and_understand (...)

;-)




More information about the Beowulf mailing list