Gigabit copper networking and Cisco gear
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Dean Johnson dtj at uberh4x0r.orgSun Oct 20 19:19:46 PDT 2002
- Previous message: Gigabit copper networking and Cisco gear
- Next message: Gigabit copper networking and Cisco gear
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 19:03, Justin.Baker at csiro.au wrote: > > Can anyone give me an idea why these switches don't seem to be used for clusters? > Also, if that's correct, what I should use instead? > In a word, "cost". Cisco products are wayyy more expensive than other "good enough" products. Clusters are often done because it is cheap horsepower. At the point where people are less cost sensitive, they often step up to something like myrinet. -Dean
- Previous message: Gigabit copper networking and Cisco gear
- Next message: Gigabit copper networking and Cisco gear
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
