Fastest Intel Processors
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Daniel Pfenniger daniel.pfenniger at obs.unige.chFri Jan 11 10:42:11 PST 2002
- Previous message: Fastest Intel Processors
- Next message: Fastest Intel Processors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
astroguy at bellsouth.net wrote >I really think this Ghz. goobly-gook is way over rated. I think, if you look more >closley at the problem, the > key to superior proformance is in the found in the actual construction or >architecture of the processor. > The Itanium, for example only runs at 733 Mghz but it has (on die) 2meg of >cashe on the L-2... The > Alpha, in its previous incarnation ran at only 233 but did 64 bit processing... >Quite amazing actually. The key to superior performance in Beowulf clusters is to compare the performance/*cost* for your application. For the moment Alpha and especially Itanium solutions appear too expensive. Dan
- Previous message: Fastest Intel Processors
- Next message: Fastest Intel Processors
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
