charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rob Latham rlatham at plogic.comSun Jan 6 14:44:50 PST 2002
- Previous message: charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
- Next message: charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 11:55:42PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > On Saturday 05 January 2002 20:10, Steve Fellini wrote: > This is rather surprising, I'd expect 2.4.x to actually improve upon 2.2.x. > It was said before on this list that 2.4 already incorporates TCP fixes. Has > anybody met a similar situation before? it was said before that the tcp fixes don't make any difference. with 2.2 you'd see some fast times and then a few really really high times. with 2.4 you get really consitent times that are a bit slower than the times you'd get with 2.2 + the tcp fixes. ==rob -- Rob Latham <rlatham at plogic.com> Paralogic Inc. EAE8 DE90 85BB 526F 3181 1FCF 51C4 B6CB 08CC 0897
- Previous message: charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
- Next message: charmm scalability on 2.4 kernels
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
