/. MS vs. university Beowulfs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Doug J Nordwall nordwall at pnl.govFri Feb 22 09:45:04 PST 2002
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I guess my view is pretty simple, and the same way that MS rules the desktop...Linux on clusters works, and works well. Why should I bother switching? The applications that run on clusters generally just would not be the sort of thing that I would normally think of on windows, and even if it could benefit from it (say with a gui) it could just as easily be a front end. I asked our windows guys (a dozen or so seasoned vets) about automatic installation, and they said it's in there, but requires third party apps. Now, I found it hard to believe, so I'll look for someone to shoot it down, but if that's the case, then there really isn't much reason :) The other thing that was a good point on slashdot was the cost per node. DO I have to license a copy of windows for every machine in the cluster? When you see people building clusters out of $250 machines (really, I know a guy who did), a $200 OS or $100 OS, or a $50 OS is a big deal. Especially when it's x16, or x32, or x128. On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 08:18, graham.mullier at syngenta.com wrote: > Well, you could have a look at http://www.windowsclusters.org/ as pointed > out by one of the slashdotters. > > http://www.windowsclusters.org/projects.htm looks the most useful from this > site, if you're trying to find some real info. > > Personally I'm not interested in a comparison of a full cluster of linux > nodes vs one of W2K nodes, but of what use can be made, in a corporate > environment, of heterogeneous clusters, pulling in and using desktop compute > cycles, a la seti at home or whatever. Obviously it's a completely different > game, and my main question is whether the return is worth the effort (i.e. > can you get enough unused compute cycles out of desktop machines to make it > worthwhile). The chapter on Condor in "Beowulf cluster computing with Linux" > (ed. Sterling; 2001) implies that it can be worth it. > > Any views? > > Graham > > Graham Mullier > Chemoinformatics Team Leader, > Chemistry Design Group, > Syngenta, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, UK. > direct line: +44 (0) 1344 414163 > mailto:Graham.Mullier at syngenta.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Velocet [mailto:math at velocet.ca] > Sent: Fri 22 February 2002 15:34 > [...] > > Have fun wading through the blind linux advocacy and silly jokes to try > and find any content. > > If someone can summarize any real information they grok from this massive > thread (ie how good is computational clustering on M$), please post it here. > > /kc > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf -- Douglas J Nordwall http://rex.nmhu.edu/~musashi System Administrator Pacific Northwest National Labs
- Previous message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Next message: /. MS vs. university Beowulfs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
