Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

external raid arrays

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Chris Black cblack at EraGen.com
Thu Feb 21 14:38:32 PST 2002


On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 04:16:20PM -0600, Dave Wright wrote:
> 
> From your description, the request sizes make a big difference as to how to
> configure a filesystem. You probably want latency not bandwidth. Stripping
> and RAID 3 or 5 will probably be bad. JBOD 0+1 is most likely better. A
> RAID has different performance for different request sizes. Kinda like a
> frequency response.
> 
> You probably want to get into JBOD with 15000rpm scsi drives.
> 

What is JBOD 0+1? I have seen JBOD supported but thought it was "Just 
a Bunch of Disks", no striping, mirroring or parity. Why do you say 
RAID5 would be bad? From one RAID vendor I heard that there was little 
to gain on db servers from going to raid 0+1 other than increased 
redundancy. Lots of the operations are not short SQL queries, but 
dumps and imports. These are what take a long time and shuffle the 
most data around.

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20020221/869fe509/attachment.bin


More information about the Beowulf mailing list