slave node problem
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Donald Becker becker at scyld.comTue Feb 5 11:51:44 PST 2002
- Previous message: slave node problem
- Next message: =?gb2312?B?aG93IHRvIHRlc3QgdGhlIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIG9mIFBJTyBhbmQgRE1B?=
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, david silverman wrote: > > > It seems to recognize the etherlink III 3c590 NIC fine during > > > bootup. > >What NIC do you have? > >Is it really an ancient 10Mbps 3c590, or some other 590/900 series card? > > The front node has a 3c905 tx, the one slave I'm testing things on has "an > ancient 10Mbps 3c590" - could one of those or the generic hub be the problem? Hmmm, I see if we have tested a '590. We don't test 10Mbps cards for the product, and I pull out those (_really_ old) cards only when I change driver code that is likely to have broken them. Note that starting up a cluster nodes at 10Mbps over a shared repeater will take a really long time. We download about 40MB of initial system, and just that network load might triggering a monitoring timeout. Donald Becker becker at scyld.com Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993
- Previous message: slave node problem
- Next message: =?gb2312?B?aG93IHRvIHRlc3QgdGhlIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIG9mIFBJTyBhbmQgRE1B?=
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list