swap or not?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Alan Scheinine scheinin at crs4.itTue Feb 5 07:26:29 PST 2002
- Previous message: swap or not?
- Next message: swap or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Galen Arnold wrote: > I'm looking for some opinions (based on real cluster setups would be nice > too). If you've got nodes with lots of memory (>1GB) do you run with swap > space configured or not? > We're seeing the occasional run that misses its memory request by a lot > and it hangs nodes due to excessive paging. I recommend having swap space, perhaps half a gigabyte. At the same time, if a job uses alot of page, it must be killed without remorse. To be notified of the problem, I suppose (I have not tried it) you can modify a script of Big Brother. My point is, these days, when even main memory is considered slow relative to level one cache, a job that pages to disk will take a very, very long time to finish in comparison to the same job with a smaller dataset that does not use swap. On the other hand, there may be jobs that need the extra space for a limited amount of time, in which case the swap space would be useful. Alan
- Previous message: swap or not?
- Next message: swap or not?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
