decent performance from G4 Macs?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caSat Apr 13 11:18:39 PDT 2002
- Previous message: k7s5a mobo based cluster
- Next message: decent performance from G4 Macs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm doing some benchmarks to evaluate whether current Macs would make suitable nodes for a serial farm (lots of nodes, preferably fast CPU and dram, but no serious interconnect.) I've tried a variety of real codes and benchmarks, but can't seem to get something like a Mac G4/800 with PC133 to perform anywhere close to even a P4/1.7/i845/PC133. I'm using either the gcc 2.95 that comes with OSX or a recent 3.1 snapshot (which is MUCH better, but still bad). is it just that the performance Apple brags about is strictly in-cache, and/or when doing something ah specialized like single-precision SIMD (altivec/velocity engine)? I haven't really pushed to track down an account on the very latest dual G4/1000, but afaikt it's got the same boring PC133. is anyone using Macs in clusters, and what kind of performance are you observing? thanks, mark hahn.
- Previous message: k7s5a mobo based cluster
- Next message: decent performance from G4 Macs?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
