very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Steffen Persvold sp at scali.comThu Apr 4 18:08:32 PST 2002
- Previous message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Next message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jim Lux wrote: > What's high bandwidth? > What's low latency? > How much money do you want to spend? > > Ethernet is cheap, $100-$200/node for 100 Mbps or GBE (by the time you get > switches, cables, adapters, etc.) > Latency is kind of slow (compared to dedicated point to point links) > > Well this is a "touchy" topic since different people has different opinions. There is also different ways of measuring bandwidth mainly point to point (two machines talking together) and bisection (dividing your nework in half and let the one half talk to the other which kind of shows how the network scales with more nodes). Also some people like to talk about the hardware bandwidth and hardware latency, while the thing that really matters (IMHO) is application to application bandwidth and latency. I don't want to start a flamewar here, but I _think_ (not knowing real numbers for other high speed interconnects) that SCI has atleast the lowest latency and maybe also the highest point to point bandwidth : SCI application to application latency : 2.5 us SCI application to application bandwidth : 325 MByte/sec Note that these numbers are very chipset specific (as most high speed interconnect numbers are), these numbers are from IA64. Here are numbers from a popular IA32 platform, the AMD 760MPX : SCI application to application latency : 1.8 us SCI application to application bandwidth : 283 MByte/sec More "real" performance numbers using MPI over SCI (also collective and application benchmarks) can be located on Dolphin's homepage http://www.dolphinics.com Other popular high speed interconnects I know of is Myrinet (considered the main competitor to SCI for cluster interconnects) and Giganet. There are some performance numbers on Myricoms homepage (http://www.myricom.com) but I doubt if that is for their latest hardware generation (correct me if I'm wrong). Best regards, -- Steffen Persvold | Scalable Linux Systems | Try out the world's best mailto:sp at scali.com | http://www.scali.com | performing MPI implementation: Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 | - ScaMPI 1.13.8 - Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY | >320MBytes/s and <4uS latency
- Previous message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Next message: very high bandwidth, low latency manner?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
