Scyld: bad scaling
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Ivan Rossi ivan at biocomp.unibo.itWed Sep 26 01:57:18 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Using firewire for a torus?
- Next message: Scyld: bad scaling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Beowulfers, recently i rebuilt our tiny 10 CPUs cluster using Scyld. Before i have been using RedHat 6.2 + LAM MPI. And i like it, it is easier to mantain. Unfortunately, after the rebuild, I found a marked performance degradation with respect to the former installation. In particular i found a disappointingly bad scaling for the application we use most, the MD program Gromacs 2.0. Now scaling goes almost exactly as the square root of the number of nodes, that is it takes 4 CPUs to double performance and nine CPUs to triple them. Since no hardware has been changed, in my opinion it must be either the pre-compiled Scyld kernel, bpsh or Scyld MPICH. So i hope that some fine tuning of them should solve the problem. Do you have any advice about the cause of the problem and about what to do? I really would like to stay with Scyld. Thanks in advance Ivan PS The cluster is composed by 4 Dual PIII 500, a dual PIII 700 front-end and an Intel Express 520 switch. RAM is 512MB on each machine. NIC are Intel eepro100 cards -- Dr. Ivan Rossi - CIRB Biocomputing Unit - University of Bologna (Italy) e-mail: ivan at biocomp.unibo.it Web: http://www.biocomp.unibo.it/ivan
- Previous message: Using firewire for a torus?
- Next message: Scyld: bad scaling
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
