FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comThu Oct 25 09:18:54 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Donald Becker wrote: > GAMMA to be widely adopted -- we could put the proper hooks into the > drivers. But that's a large effort that would be a resource and > financial drain, without any associated revenue. Well, if your product can provide, for a medium/large panel of Ethernet and GigE NICs, low latency and OS-Bypass protocols (socket+MPI), the market for Ethernet based clusters is definitively yours. Now, can it be a source of substancial revenue ? Not simple if the soft is completely open-source. Patrick ---------------------------------------------------------- | Patrick Geoffray, Ph.D. patrick at myri.com | Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com | Cell: 865-389-8852 685 Emory Valley Rd (B) | Phone: 865-425-0978 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 ----------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
