SGEEE easily mistaken as commercial version
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.cz hanzl at noel.feld.cvut.czThu Oct 25 04:49:12 PDT 2001
- Previous message: [GE dev] SGEEE easily mistaken as commercial version
- Next message: GROMACS cluster benchmarks for d.dppc on Athlon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I dare to rely Fritz Ferstl's answer which did not make it through cause he probably is not subscribed. Hope you'll not blacklist me as an offtopic SGE advocate :) Vaclav -- From: Fritz Ferstl <Friedrich.Ferstl at Sun.COM> To: dev at gridengine.sunsource.net Cc: beowulf at beowulf.org Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:39:59 +0200 (MEST) Hi Vaclav, thanks for your message. You are right. We should have the availability of both product modes in a more prominent place and we should make the installation easier. We'll change that. Thanks also for stressing that indeed the Grid Engine project has a strong open source commitment and therefore provides access to all the available technology through the very open SISSL license. Thanks again for your interest in the project as well as for your comments and clarifications. Cheers, Fritz
- Previous message: [GE dev] SGEEE easily mistaken as commercial version
- Next message: GROMACS cluster benchmarks for d.dppc on Athlon
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
