MVIA and GAMMA (Was Re: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Eray Ozkural (exa) erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.trWed Oct 24 17:55:20 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: MVIA and GAMMA (Was Re: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 25 October 2001 03:32, Greg Lindahl wrote: > Another project doing this is MVIA, which, coupled with MVICH, would > provide equivalent software functionality to GM plus MPICH/GM. > Yes, both projects have been very promising. In fact, what interested me was the really low latencies they obtained on common switched fast ethernet networks. Has anybody experienced significant speedup on codes with high number of messages using these systems? Thanks, - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <erayo at cs.bilkent.edu.tr> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F 88B0 A745 F31B EA0F 7C07 AE16 874D 539C -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE712L8fAeuFodNU5wRArU/AKCNNCsReTdko7+mVwgs/+gD1yENFACdFej9 qh5rKmQXmnZaD2dNYbRbOBA= =Xqpw -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: MVIA and GAMMA (Was Re: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
