FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comWed Oct 24 03:41:59 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote: > Which brings to my mind GAMMA project. Why wasn't that project backed up by > other people so that it could be made into production use? The latencies > reported in the papers and the website are absolutely awesome. With GAMMA/MPI > we could easily have the courage to play with fine-grained algorithms. You are right. The GAMMA work is excellent, and the idea to provide a OS-bypass protocol easily portable over the Ethernet family is a good one. The difficult part here is the number of different NICs and the lack of support from the vendors. I had the occasion to visit Giovani and Guiseppe in Genoa, and they had an evident lack of human and hardware ressources. I would encourage developpers in search for a good project to participate, and vendors to loan/give NICs (or at least increasing the life time of the GigE NICs, nothing is more frustating to finish a driver when the NIC is discontinued). Patrick ---------------------------------------------------------- | Patrick Geoffray, Ph.D. patrick at myri.com | Myricom, Inc. http://www.myri.com | Cell: 865-389-8852 685 Emory Valley Rd (B) | Phone: 865-425-0978 Oak Ridge, TN 37830 ----------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Next message: FNN vs GigabitEther & Myrinet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
