NTP? (accurate clocks)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govThu Oct 11 16:32:16 PDT 2001
- Previous message: NTP?
- Next message: NIS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 06:26 PM 10/11/2001 -0400, you wrote: >On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Greg Lindahl wrote: > > > Now if you want GOOD time synchronization (to within a microsecond) > > that's a *much* harder problem... > >Yes, it starts to become very difficult and expensive right in there >somewhere. The so called "atomic clocks" one can now buy in stores like >Wal Mart for $50 or so are autosync'd to WWVB at NIST in Colorado. >Unfortunately, Colorado is about 1000 miles away, which is around 3 >microseconds right off the top that is difficult to compensate for. >Also, this station broadcasts at only 60 kHz which means that time >resolution is likely to be more like milliseconds or worse. Network >jitter and so forth complicate net-based time sync connections, although >one can get to millisecond accuracy on a good day (or over several good >days). >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit >http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf I have built a variety of PC based systems that need to have very accurate absolute timing in UT terms(to record satellite signals that you are later going to compare against other records). We used a variety of GPS based systems for this. Your basic run of the mill GPS receiver has a 1pps output typically good to around 100 nanoseconds (absolute). A variety of NTP and NTP server programs can take this input on one of the RS232 status lines (like carrier detect or ring indicator) of a PC and distribute the time appropriately (limited mostly by the uncertainty in interrupt latency) For better performance, there are a number of GPS disciplined clocks around for a few thousand bucks that can maintain accuracy to better than a part in 1E11 (which is awfully good...). They have a temperature compensated quartz oscillator that is "disciplined" by the GPS (which has some variability for a bunch of esoteric reasons). There is also an inexpensive hacker way to go about it, if you are willing to do a bit of soldering. The "totally accurate clock" kit is essentially an interface to an OEM GPS receiver that does the interface to the PC and a hardware counter. There is also a $50 kit to discipline a surplus VCXO (Voltage controlled crystal oscillator). OEM Motorola receivers and antennas are available from http://www.synergy-gps.com/ among other suppliers. Trimble and Garmin also sell appropriate products. The summary is: For around $300 you can probably have atomic clock accuracy, at least over time spans of a day. This is more than accurate enough to measure relativistic changes in satellite signals, the tectonic movement of the plate upon which your house sits, etc. If you want very very accurate timing, things like antennas, choke rings, etc. become important to deal with multipath and things like shifts in the antenna phase center as a function of look angle. Jim Lux Spacecraft Telecommunications Equipment Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Road, Mail Stop 161-213 Pasadena CA 91109 818/354-2075, fax 818/393-6875
- Previous message: NTP?
- Next message: NIS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
