Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Daniel Kidger Daniel.Kidger at quadrics.comFri Nov 23 01:56:37 PST 2001
- Previous message: ask
- Next message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> I have recently built a small beowulf cluster and am now looking at >> getting a Fortran90 compiler. Can anyone on the list recommend >> which are better for Linux (Redhat 7.2) using mpich (1.2.2.3) ? > >>I've tested three Fortran 90 compilers in this basic environment, on a >>suite of scientific codes. They are the Portland Group's f90, NAG >>f95, and Lahey/Fujitsu's lf95. I also tried the Portland Group HPF >>compiler. > >>I have found the Portland Group products to be heavily bug-ridden, and >>essentially unusable by a group of scientists that are actively >>developing code that uses Fortran 90 (or HPF) features. Moreover, >>carefully constructed bug reports submitted to the company failed to >>stir them. I strongly advise avoiding this company. I would be very careful about your damming of Portland. It is widely used and a large base of users and so expect some flames! However you do not mention the Intel Compiler. In virtually all our tests on dual Pentium 4s, it outperformed the others that we tried. Also it works fine with mpich (apart from the fact that you need to build mpich to expect only a single underscore on subroutines) Yours, Daniel. -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Dan Kidger, Quadrics Ltd. daniel.kidger at quadrics.com One Bridewell St., Bristol, BS1 2AA, UK 0117 915 5505 ----------------------- www.quadrics.com --------------------
- Previous message: ask
- Next message: Fortran compilers for Linux/mpich
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
