MPI or PVM enabled jre?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Tom Wainwright thomas.wainwright at noaa.govMon May 21 14:26:11 PDT 2001
- Previous message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Next message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It's obvious from this thread that there is little overlap between the Beowulf and Java numerics communities. There is much going on on numerical work in Java. For an introduction, see the Java Numerics page: http://math.nist.gov/javanumerics/ which has some tantalizing benchmarks suggesting the best Java jre's have ca. 90% the speed of optimized C for some numerical problems. Also, IBM is working on improving java efficiency: see their Ninja project: http://www.research.ibm.com/ninja/ Also, a simple web search on "Java MPI" or "Java PVM" will bring up several implementations of each. Personally, I am working on a Java/Beowulf ecosystem modeling project, but am too early in the development to say anything regarding performance, etc. (I don't even have the machines plugged in yet.) If anyone gets to testing the Java MPI/PVM implementations before me, I'd love to hear your reviews. -- Tom Wainwright NOAA/NMFS/NWFSC 2030 S Marine Science Dr Newport, OR 97365 USA thomas.wainwright at noaa.gov
- Previous message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Next message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
