custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bari Ari bari at onelabs.comTue May 29 08:46:37 PDT 2001
- Previous message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Next message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Douglas Eadline wrote: > Keep in mind there is no easy way to correlate dense CPUs or MFLOPS per > watt to actual performance. Packing CPUs in a custom 1U box > may be a big win for some problems, but a big waste of money > for others. > The StoneSoup BeoClusters will always be the best approach for many as others have pointed out here due to budget, reuse and management/organizational constraints. > Also, the "lego we use" in the Beowulf community is largely > what is produced for other much larger markets and while we would like > to see some things done differently, there is a reasonable > trade-off between cost/flexibility/performance. The turn-key clusters of 16 nodes and greater targeted at high speed with high bandwith/low latency interconnects seems to be where things can be improved significantly. Maybe some new "legos" are needed. > > I find it interesting that in all the talk of P4 systems > there is little discussion about the Intel chips-set > for the P4 only supporting 32 PCI. If you need anything > other than Fast Ethernet this could be a real drawback > (i.e. an imbalanced system with bottle necks) > The new Xeon chip set has 2 64-bit slots. Of course there > are other chip-sets on the immediate horizon, but > the market seems to be making a clear differentiation about the > "desktop" vs. "server" product. Some applications will churn away at a piece of data for hours or days before spitting out a few bits to pass on or compare to what the other nodes have as results. A 300bps link between nodes may be adequate here. Other applications may only run through a few CPU cycles before passing on a chunk of data where even 10Gb/sec interconnections are bottlenecks. It's this high speed end of clustering where I see a need for improvements. I have seen interest in the P4 for it's raw performance only and not for the lack of current support for DDR and 64/66 PCI. It's all around the corner though from all the chipset vendors. Infinband will really make a big difference for high speed and high bandwidth applications when it comes standard in chipsets. Bari
- Previous message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Next message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
