Disk reliability (Was: Node cloning)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Josip Loncaric josip at icase.eduTue May 29 06:49:29 PDT 2001
- Previous message: Disk reliability (Was: Node cloning)
- Next message: Disk reliability (Was: Node cloning)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: > > > What size of CRCs are being used? > > hmm, I'll admit I never actually looked at the details. > the CRC is 16b (not really surprising, since ATA is that wide): > G(X) = X15 + X12 + X5 + 1. The ATA channel is usually quite reliable. BadCRC errors are rarely seen, and the probability of missing one despite the 16-bit CRC is 2^16 times lower. This means that there is no need to worry unless the system is regularly reporting lots of BadCRC events. If your target MTBF is one year, "lots" means about a few hundred BadCRC events per day. Sincerely, Josip P.S. You need at least UltraDMA mode 2 to get CRC protection (=> you do not want to turn off DMA without a really good reason). Lower modes (PIO or multiword DMA) do not have CRC protection. -- Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow mailto:josip at icase.edu ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ NASA Langley Research Center mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 Fax +1 757 864-6134
- Previous message: Disk reliability (Was: Node cloning)
- Next message: Disk reliability (Was: Node cloning)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
