custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kevin Facinelli ksfacinelli at yahoo.comWed May 23 13:58:25 PDT 2001
- Previous message: custom cluster cabinets - cost of ownership...
- Next message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
If the entire top of the case was a heatsink many other variable come to mind....what happens when you stack or rack??? how thick will the lid be? How would you get air across the lid in a racked configuration. Let's think about this??? why does it have to be 1U??...think a little bit outside the box...if the unit could be any shape would it be thin and narrow creating a terrible aspect ratio for air movement...NO. Take a look at the ingenious approach of this product: http://www.crystalpc.com/products/computers/cs300.asp The cooling and space advantages are easy to see. Kevin --- Josip Loncaric <josip at icase.edu> wrote: > Bari Ari wrote: > > > > I did a quick compute of the P4 thermal design and > it would be possible > > to put 8 P4s into a 1U if you could use the entire > surface area of the > > top of the enclosure as a heat sink [...] > > A neat idea. However, one would also have to > justify its cost. > > How large would the market be? Deep pocket > customers only? Then, the > price will be high, and all but the most space > constrained users will > flee to cheaper alternatives. The same reasoning > applies to the > discussion concerning 1U vs. commodity cases. > > Technical computing users used to be kings of the > computing jungle, but > that was decades ago. A few of them still have deep > pockets and the > ability to buy exactly what they want. The rest are > using mass market > leverage to buy compute cycles at a discount. > Unless some day mass > market switches to high density packaging, this > feature will continue to > cost extra. > > I see the Beowulf concept of using commodity > components as a way of > establishing the base price of computing. I'd be > willing to pay more, > but only if this alleviates some critical > constraint. Then, the price > of non-commodity extras (Myrinet, high density > packaging, etc.) can be > justified. > > Sincerely, > Josip > > -- > Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow > mailto:josip at icase.edu > ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at > http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ > NASA Langley Research Center > mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov > Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 > Fax +1 757 864-6134 > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or > unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf ===== Kevin Facinelli www.colosource.com webmaster at colosource.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/
- Previous message: custom cluster cabinets - cost of ownership...
- Next message: custom cluster cabinets (was Re: 1U P4 Systems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
