1U P4 Systems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bob Drzyzgula bob at drzyzgula.orgTue May 22 18:50:56 PDT 2001
- Previous message: 1U P4 Systems
- Next message: 1U P4 Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 05:47:52PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > > Martin, I'd have to echo this frustration. Pretty much all the XU cases > I've found are more than $200, some quite a bit more. Then you've got > to buy the rack. Compared to $50-60 for a standard mid-tower case this > is painful beyond measure when buying in volume, especially when the > total node cost might only be $600-750 outside of the case. Robert, First, I'll say that I believe that the #1 reason why rack-mount cases cost this much is that they sell at that price, in sufficient numbers so as to make a comfortable profit for the case manufacturers. If everyone would just stop buying them at that price, we might see some improvement. :-) Then again, this might just make them *more* expensive, depending. :-( This does beg the question of why low-cost competition does not yet exist. I'd guess that problem is partly in the sales volumes vs. engineering NRCs. But it may also partly be in the the mechanicals -- a 2U, rack-mount chassis needs to have a skin that is much more rigid than that required for a minitower -- a minitower gets a lot of its rigidity from the internal framing structure, which in turn can get its rigidity from being stamped and bent into weight-efficient but volume-inefficient support braces and trusses. This is much harder to do in a flat box like a 2U chassis. Consider two chassis, a 3.5"x24"x17" rackmount and a 17"x18"x8" minitower (both height x depth x width). The rackmount has a volume of 1428 i^3 and a surface area of 1103 i^2, while the minitower has a volume of 2448 i^3 and a surface area of 1172 i^3. The rackmount's cover and base, flat surfaces which need to be supported and kept flat, are 408 i^2, with a 29" diagonal, while the comparable surfaces in the minitower are 144 i^2 with a diagonal of 19". The rackmount has a broader expanse of metal to be kept flat at the same time that it has less internal space to use up doing it. It's probably also partly because of the power supply constraints -- a typical, hyper-mass-produced ATX power supply is too tall to fit in a 2U chassis, and a 300W power supply for a 1U chassis will be significantly harder to do; think about the big electrolytics and transformers which have to somehow be fit into a space no more than 1.25" tall (leaving 0.5" for sheet metal and air). I just took apart a dead 235W Sparkle supply and there's got to be a dozen components and subassemblies in there that are more than 1.25" tall; several are more than 2" tall. There's electrolytics, heat sinks, circuit subassemblies, transformers and a big old toroid which would all have to be re-engineered or at least re-mounted horizontally, sucking up precious board surface area, and that's just in a 235W supply. > I regretfully opted for shelves of midtowers for my latest effort(s) -- > one can achieve something like (within a factor of 2, surely) of the > packing of 2U cases -- I can fairly easily get 16 nodes in a 1-1.5 m^2 > floorspace footprint (depending on how you like to count the gaps > between units) without going over two nodes high and could double that > with tall shelves. This does a good job of fitting the requirements of an ad-hoc or perhaps a lab environment, but in a production data center environment these can be decidedly sub-optimal. It is relatively difficult to get good cooling for hundreds of devices in a small area in open-frame racks like this. At my office we have about thirty-five 19" racks in four rows, bolted side-to-side with panels on the ends of each row, and doors on the front and backs of each rack. (This is just for my group -- there are well over a hundred other racks in this data center.) They sit on a raised floor with positive plenum pressure into the base of the rack, fed by recirculating chillers and assisted by fan trays in the tops and bottoms of the racks. Even in this environment we run into heat problems when the system density gets high. (FWIW, what we are short on is chiller capacity; some of our racks are gulpling for chilled air.) > It's not as pretty and it is a bit more work to put together neatly, but > I still assembled a 16 node cluster in about four hours total work > including assembling the heavy duty steel shelving. The shelving itself > cost only $50 total (plus another $50 or so for cable ties and surge > protectors and miscellany to make it look nice) saving me about $2500. > That's serious money for six hours of work (allowing for the time to > drive to Home Depot and buy the shelving:-) -- 3 nodes worth of money. > I'll make the time back in the first DAY of fulltime operation. FWIW, at home I use one of those NSF-certified wire racks, the kind where you can tie wrap everything to death. If you have access to a Costco Warehouse store, see if they have these in stock. At the one near me (Gaithersburg, MD), they carry a setup with two-section 6' poles, four 18"x48" shelves with centerline bracing, 5" back fences for each shelf (great for tie-wrapping cable trunks), locking 4" hard rubber casters and leveling glides to use if you don't want to use the casters. These take about ten minutes to put together if you've done it a few times and know the tricks. You can easily fit as many as twenty minitowers on one of these, and wheel it around when you're done. For this they want $77. Talk about the advantages of volume production... http://www.costco.com/frameset.asp?trg=product%2Easp&catid=114&subid=858&hierid=1090&prdid=10002618&log= > Case vendors take note: there is some insanity here. Perhaps a 1U case > is tricky, but a 2U case is pretty nearly a desktop case with rack > mounts on the side. In all cases they are basically sheetmetal boxes > with a motherboard mount, a power supply, and a place to hang a disk and > a place to poke a card or three out. No way that 4x is a reasonable > multiplier for the retail cost -- it just holds down your volume in the > beowulf and server market. Not so sure about this. See above. > I'd like to see 1U or 2U cases selling for a competitive $50-75 (where > the margin allows for a bit of extra cooling for the 1U cases). I think that the production volumes would have to go up dramatically for this to happen, and even then there will probably always be a significant price premium because most customers will be businesses, not individual consumers, and businesses will in fact pay more for something like this. What the market will bear and all that. > But I don't think I'm going to anytime soon...:-( Probably not. --Bob
- Previous message: 1U P4 Systems
- Next message: 1U P4 Systems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
