FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Huntingdon hunting at ix.netcom.comMon May 21 19:30:15 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob If you can be more specific, I can come back with what ever pricing might be needed. cheers ~m At 08:47 PM 5/21/01 -0400, you wrote: >On Mon, May 21, 2001 at 06:19:52PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: >> >> This isn't to complain about your ranking -- I think it is very useful >> and one does have to create some sort of standard in order to compare >> price performance. It is just to note that if one's application DOESN'T >> use a GB of core the price/performance rankings can signficantly change >> because of the nonlinearities in the cost space. > >Robert, > >Good point. I had focused on 1GB configurations because >that's what we are currently using at work, to support >some huge, memory-hungry jobs. I took a stab at readjusting >for 512MB configurations (768MB gets to be a hassle to do >in highly interleaved systems like the UltraSPARC). This >table is a bit shakier than the last ones because I don't >have good data for the smaller memory configurations >on the UltraSPARCs, and, as I pointed out previously, >the Alpha and HP prices are WAGs anyway. Not that precise >data on these is likely to change the rankings much, but >does anyone have better pricing info for these that they >can share? Anyway, this is what I came up with, sorted >only by Sfp2K/K$: > >Core$ is for MB + CPU + 512MB memory > >Processor MHz L2 Si Sfp core $ Sfp/K$ Notes >-------------------------- ---- ---- --- --- ------ ---- ------------------- >AMD Athlon (Thunderbird) 1300 256 491 374 400 935 (A7V, PC133 SDRAM) >AMD Athlon (Thunderbird) 1330 256 539 445 600 742 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM) >Pentium 4 1700 256 586 608 900 676 (D850GB, RDRAM) >Pentium III (Coppermine) 1000 256 428 314 700 449 (VC820, RDRAM) >Alpha (21264) 833 8192 533 644 8,500 76 (UP2000+, est) >UltraSPARC III 750 8192 395 421 7,500 56 (Ocelot) >PA-8700 750 603 581 13,500 43 (HP J6700, 2304KB L1) >UltraSPARC II 480 8192 234 291 9,000 32 (AXdp) > >--Bob > >PS, BTW, FYI & FWIW, for those of you with a sense of >deja-vu, the message Robert just responded to was in fact >essentially a duplicate of one I sent before, only it came >from my office address rather than my personal address. >I had done a reply instead of a forward so that I could >edit the content (I have mutt set to forward messages >as mime attachments), but then I forgot to take the beowulf >address off. I thought the message was dead because my >work address isn't subscribed to the list. I sent mail >to the admin address asking that it be deleted rather than >approved, but I guess that it got approved and posted >anyway. :-( > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
