MPI or PVM enabled jre?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Moene toon at moene.indiv.nluug.nlMon May 21 11:25:49 PDT 2001
- Previous message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Next message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Michael T. Prinkey" wrote: > I certainly wouldn't want to speak for the entire community, but I think > that most of us are just now crawling out of the FORTRAN days. When people say this, often - when asked about particulars - they expound on the, uhhh, non-virtues of FORTRAN 66. For the benefit of this mailing list I'd like to emphasize that since those good ol' days, three more Fortran Standards have been produced (and are actively tracked in most compilers): Fortran 77, Fortran 90 and Fortran 95. :-) -- Toon Moene - mailto:toon at moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290 Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)
- Previous message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Next message: MPI or PVM enabled jre?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
