FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comThu May 10 10:53:30 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:11:39PM -0400, Josip Loncaric wrote: > Per GHz, the F77 P4 "win" factors are 1.25-1.59, while the F90 P4 > "loss" factor is 1.38. What's the point of per GHz comparison? The P4 and the Athlon aren't available at the same GHz, and the wide memory system of the P4 is a large part of its advantage. > We'd like to test our own code compiled with our own compilers. The > overall 2:1 performance uncertainty is too large to ignore. Since both Intel and PGI make their compilers temporarily available for free -- beta-test until September for Intel, trial version from PGI -- you might as well test with the best compilers, instead of the ones you happen to own. -- g
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
