FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Josip Loncaric josip at icase.eduThu May 10 10:11:39 PDT 2001
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
We are also looking at the SPECfp2000 numbers like these: Bob Drzyzgula wrote: > > Processor MHz L2 KB SPi2K SPfp2K est core $ > ------------------------- ---- ------ ----- ------ ---------- > Pentium 4 1500 256 536 558 2,100 (D850GB, RDRAM) > AMD Athlon (Thunderbird) 1330 256 539 445 2,000 (GA7DX, DDR SDRAM) Looking at the details of the SPEC tests, it seems that the compiler plays a huge role. Both machines ran Windows 2000 SP1. The P4 result used Intel's Fortran 5.0 (ifl), while the Athlon result used ifl for some F77 code and Compaq Visual Fortran 6.5 for other F77 and F90 code. Athlon vs. Pentium 4 benchmarks range all over the place. SPECfp2000 has some CFD-like tests (swim, mgrid, applu, galgel). The 1.7 GHz Pentium 4 beats 1.33 GHz Athlon on F77 code, but loses on F90 code. Per GHz, the F77 P4 "win" factors are 1.25-1.59, while the F90 P4 "loss" factor is 1.38. P4 should shine on codes where data is accessed sequentially with unit stride. Jumping around can lead to very inefficient use of the memory bandwidth. Also, optimization switches can make a huge difference. We'd like to test our own code compiled with our own compilers. The overall 2:1 performance uncertainty is too large to ignore. For memory bandwidth limited code optimized for P4-friendly memory access patterns, P4 should beat Athlon by about 50%. This performance gain matches the fact that PC2100 (DDR SDRAM) memory is currently about 40% cheaper than PC3200 (RDRAM) memory. Unfortunately, we just do not know how many codes fit into that P4-friendly category yet... Sincerely, Josip P.S. This link has results of a CFD benchmark on a variety of machines. They report virtually identical P4 and Athlon performance on the "per GHz" basis: http://www.caselab.okstate.edu/research/benchmark.html -- Dr. Josip Loncaric, Research Fellow mailto:josip at icase.edu ICASE, Mail Stop 132C PGP key at http://www.icase.edu./~josip/ NASA Langley Research Center mailto:j.loncaric at larc.nasa.gov Hampton, VA 23681-2199, USA Tel. +1 757 864-2192 Fax +1 757 864-6134
- Previous message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Next message: FYI: Current SPECfp landscape...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
