Beowulf digest, Vol 1 #226 - 10 msgs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
ESL401k at aol.com ESL401k at aol.comThu Jan 11 17:23:24 PST 2001
- Previous message: Kickstart question ...
- Next message: Scyld MPI & debugger
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe: Although a standards committee might come in handy for the systems themselves, (minimally, standards could be set for communications between distributive systems), I don't think regulating source code, at this time, is a reasonable option. Distributive applications are infants; they need time to grow and encourage additional application development. Beowulf is a tremendously promising technology. It need not be given the UNIX BSD path to follow. The proven way to have excellent, quickly-cycled, software development is by allowing non regulated open source. I concur, however, that a comprehensive repository need be developed. Sincerely, Eric S. Lewis
- Previous message: Kickstart question ...
- Next message: Scyld MPI & debugger
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
