Gigabit ethernet or myrinet ?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at conservativecomputer.comFri Feb 23 20:46:47 PST 2001
- Previous message: Gigabit ethernet or myrinet ?
- Next message: The FNN (Flat Neighborhood Network) paradox
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:13:18AM +0800, Woo Chat Ming wrote: > I am going to set up a 100-nodes beowulf cluster > to do scientific simulation. Is Gigabit ethernet or > Myrinet better ? Does anyone has performance comparation > of them ? The main reason to choose one or another isn't necessarily performance. Here's a summary: Myrinet: cards expensive, big switches possible and relatively cheap mpich/gm gives near peak performance Gigabit Ethernet over TCP/IP: cards cheap, big switches expensive and annoying mpich over tcp/ip gives 1/2 peak performance and eats a lot of cpu Gigabit Ethernet with MVIA driver: cost is the same, but only a few cards work with MVIA mvich (mpich + vi device) is fairly new, and isn't really ready for prime time yet. (If I'm wrong about this, someone please correct me.) Try pricing a 100-port gigabit switch with good bisection bandwidth. This just happens to be near the sweet spot for Myrinet. -- greg
- Previous message: Gigabit ethernet or myrinet ?
- Next message: The FNN (Flat Neighborhood Network) paradox
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
